lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 17:14:12 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/mlx5: Use DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL macro to allow 32 bit to
 build

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 03:43:05PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2019 16:28:21 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:54:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > 
> > > When testing 32 bit x86, my build failed with:
> > > 
> > >   ERROR: "__udivdi3" [drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko] undefined!
> > > 
> > > It appears that a few non-ULL roundup() calls were made, which uses a
> > > normal division against a 64 bit number. This is fine for x86_64, but
> > > on 32 bit x86, it causes the compiler to look for a helper function
> > > __udivdi3, which we do not have in the kernel, and thus fails to build.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > 
> > Do you like this version better?
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10950913/
> > 
> 
> Honestly, I don't care ;-)
> 
> As long as it is correct and doesn't break my builds. I really prefer
> if these kinds of things don't make it into Linus's tree to begin with.
> I'm surprised the zero-day bot didn't catch this. Because this is
> something that it normally does.

Yes, I was also surprised and I asked them.. They said they needed to
update ARM compilers to see this..

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ