linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: Monitor killed tasks.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 07:39:25 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: Monitor killed tasks.

Hi Tetsuo,

On Thu, 23 May 2019 06:09:07 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> > What I do for making patches is:
> > 
> >   git fetch --tags
> >   git reset --hard next-$date
> >   edit files
> >   git commit -a -s
> >   git format-patch -1
> >   git send-email --to=$recipient 0001-*.patch
> > 
> > I'm sure I will confuse git history/repository everyday if
> > I try to send changes using git. For my skill level, managing
> > 0001-*.patch in a subversion repository is the simplest and safest.
> >   
> 
> I put an example patch into my subversion repository:
> 
>   svn checkout https://svn.osdn.net/svnroot/tomoyo/branches/syzbot-patches/
> 
> To fetch up-to-date debug printk() patches:
> 
>   cd syzbot-patches
>   svn update
> 
> Does this work for you?

Neither will fit into my normal workflow.

So, tell me, what are you trying to do?  What does you work depend on?
Just Linus' tree, or something already in linux-next?  Why would you
want to keep moving your patch(es) on top of linux-next?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped