lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:59:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>, "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] mm: reparent slab memory on cgroup removal On Wed, 22 May 2019 21:43:54 +0000 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote: > Is this patchset good to go? Or do you have any remaining concerns? > > It has been carefully reviewed by Shakeel; and also Christoph and Waiman > gave some attention to it. > > Since commit 172b06c32b94 ("mm: slowly shrink slabs with a relatively") > has been reverted, the memcg "leak" problem is open again, and I've heard > from several independent people and companies that it's a real problem > for them. So it will be nice to close it asap. > > I suspect that the fix is too heavy for stable, unfortunately. > > Please, let me know if you have any issues that preventing you > from pulling it into the tree. I looked, and put it on ice for a while, hoping to hear from mhocko/hannes. Did they look at the earlier versions?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists