[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190522225220.GC15389@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 19:52:20 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@...lanox.com>,
Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@...el.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Use HMM for ODP v4
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 06:42:11PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > The way race is avoided is because mm->hmm will either be NULL or
> > > point to another hmm struct before an existing hmm is free.
> >
> > There is no locking on mm->hmm so it is useless to prevent races.
>
> There is locking on mm->hmm
Not in mm_get_hmm()
> > So we agree this patch is necessary? Can you test it an ack it please?
>
> A slightly different patch than this one is necessary i will work on
> it tomorrow.
I think if you want something different you should give feedback on
this patch. You haven't rasied any defects with it.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists