linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: concat: refactor concat_lock/concat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190522231948.17559-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 11:19:47 +1200
From:   Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
        marek.vasut@...il.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at,
        vigneshr@...com
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: concat: refactor concat_lock/concat_unlock

concat_lock() and concat_unlock() only differed in terms of the mtd_xx
operation they called. Refactor them to use a common helper function and
pass a boolean flag to indicate whether lock or unlock is needed.

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
---
Changes in v2:
- Use a boolean flag instead of passing a function pointer.

 drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c | 44 +++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c
index cbc5925e6440..6cb60dea509a 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c
@@ -451,7 +451,8 @@ static int concat_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int concat_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
+static int concat_xxlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len,
+			 bool is_lock)
 {
 	struct mtd_concat *concat = CONCAT(mtd);
 	int i, err = -EINVAL;
@@ -470,7 +471,10 @@ static int concat_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 		else
 			size = len;
 
-		err = mtd_lock(subdev, ofs, size);
+		if (is_lock)
+			err = mtd_lock(subdev, ofs, size);
+		else
+			err = mtd_unlock(subdev, ofs, size);
 		if (err)
 			break;
 
@@ -485,38 +489,14 @@ static int concat_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int concat_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
+static int concat_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
 {
-	struct mtd_concat *concat = CONCAT(mtd);
-	int i, err = 0;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < concat->num_subdev; i++) {
-		struct mtd_info *subdev = concat->subdev[i];
-		uint64_t size;
-
-		if (ofs >= subdev->size) {
-			size = 0;
-			ofs -= subdev->size;
-			continue;
-		}
-		if (ofs + len > subdev->size)
-			size = subdev->size - ofs;
-		else
-			size = len;
-
-		err = mtd_unlock(subdev, ofs, size);
-		if (err)
-			break;
-
-		len -= size;
-		if (len == 0)
-			break;
-
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		ofs = 0;
-	}
+	return concat_xxlock(mtd, ofs, len, true);
+}
 
-	return err;
+static int concat_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
+{
+	return concat_xxlock(mtd, ofs, len, false);
 }
 
 static void concat_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd)
-- 
2.21.0