| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 08:05:09 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Li Jun <jun.li@....com>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Min Guo <min.guo@...iatek.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by node
Hi Heikki,
Thanks for the feedback.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get usb_role_switch by
> node
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 09:45:46AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Heikki,
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback.
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get
> > > usb_role_switch by node
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:06:41AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > > > Hi Heikki,
> > > >
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] usb: roles: add API to get
> > > > > usb_role_switch by node
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:39:11AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 16:05 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 01:37:36PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 04:47:21PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Add fwnode_usb_role_switch_get() to make easier to get
> > > > > > > > > usb_role_switch by fwnode which register it.
> > > > > > > > > It's useful when there is not device_connection
> > > > > > > > > registered between two drivers and only knows the fwnode
> > > > > > > > > which register usb_role_switch.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus
> > > > > > > > <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hold on. I just noticed Rob's comment on patch 2/6, where he
> > > > > > > points out that you don't need to use device graph since the
> > > > > > > controller is the parent of the connector. Doesn't that mean
> > > > > > > you don't really need this API?
> > > > > > No, I still need it.
> > > > > > The change is about the way how to get fwnode; when use device
> > > > > > graph, get fwnode by of_graph_get_remote_node(); but now will
> > > > > > get fwnode by of_get_parent();
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, I get that, but I'm still not convinced about if something
> > > > > like this function is needed at all. I also have concerns
> > > > > regarding how you are using the function. I'll explain in
> > > > > comment to the patch 5/6 in this
> > > series...
> > > >
> > > > FYI, Currently I am also using this api in my patch series.
> > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944637/
> > >
> > > Yes, and I have the same question for you I jusb asked in comment I
> > > added to the patch 5/6 of this series. Why isn't usb_role_switch_get()
> enough?
> >
> > Currently no issue. It will work with this api as well, since the port node is
> part of controller node.
> > For eg:-
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10944627/
> >
> > However if any one adds port node inside the connector node, then this
> api may won't work as expected.
> > Currently I get below error
> >
> > [ 2.299703] OF: graph: no port node found in
> /soc/i2c@...00000/hd3ss3220@47
>
> We need to understand why is that happening?
>
Form the stack trace the parent node is "parent_node=hd3ss3220@47" , instead of the "connector" node.
That is the reason for the above error.
[ 2.442429] of_graph_get_next_endpoint.part.0+0x28/0x168
[ 2.447889] of_fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint+0x5c/0xb0
[ 2.453267] fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint+0x20/0x30
[ 2.458374] device_connection_find_match+0x74/0x1a0
[ 2.463399] usb_role_switch_get+0x20/0x28
[ 2.467542] hd3ss3220_probe+0xc4/0x218
The use case is
&i2c0 {
hd3ss3220@47 {
compatible = "ti,hd3ss3220";
usb_con: connector {
compatible = "usb-c-connector";
port {
hd3ss3220_ep: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&usb3_role_switch>;
};
};
};
};
};
&usb3_peri0 {
companion = <&xhci0>;
usb-role-switch;
port {
usb3_role_switch: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&hd3ss3220_ep>;
};
};
};
Q1) How do we modify the usb_role_switch_get() function to search
Child(connector) and child's endpoint?
> It looks like we have an issue somewhere in the code, and instead of fixing
> that, you are working around it. Let's not do that.
OK.
Regards,
Biju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists