linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/12] mips: Reserve memory for the kernel image resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWS9vMUuWAbgZ9tpNcStXOvP2eRkA7WtPOERA3keLq9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 10:14:47 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] mips: Reserve memory for the kernel image resources

Hi Mike,

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 10:08 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:47:04AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 04:56:39PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:50 AM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > The reserved_end variable had been used by the bootmem_init() code
> > > > > to find a lowest limit of memory available for memmap blob. The original
> > > > > code just tried to find a free memory space higher than kernel was placed.
> > > > > This limitation seems justified for the memmap ragion search process, but
> > > > > I can't see any obvious reason to reserve the unused space below kernel
> > > > > seeing some platforms place it much higher than standard 1MB. Moreover
> > > > > the RELOCATION config enables it to be loaded at any memory address.
> > > > > So lets reserve the memory occupied by the kernel only, leaving the region
> > > > > below being free for allocations. After doing this we can now discard the
> > > > > code freeing a space between kernel _text and VMLINUX_LOAD_ADDRESS symbols
> > > > > since it's going to be free anyway (unless marked as reserved by
> > > > > platforms).
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > This is now commit b93ddc4f9156205e ("mips: Reserve memory for the kernel
> > > > image resources") in v5.2-rc1, which causes rbtx4927 to crash during boot:
> > > >
> > > >     VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) on device 0:13.
> > > >     devtmpfs: mounted
> > > >     BUG: Bad page state in process swapper  pfn:00001
> > > >     page:804b7820 refcount:0 mapcount:-128 mapping:00000000 index:0x1
> > > >     flags: 0x0()
> > > >     raw: 00000000 00000100 00000200 00000000 00000001 00000000 ffffff7f 00000000
> > > >     page dumped because: nonzero mapcount
> > > >     Modules linked in:
> > > >     CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted
> > > > 5.2.0-rc1-rbtx4927-00468-g3c05ea3d4077b756-dirty #137
> > > >     Stack : 00000000 10008400 8040dd2c 87c1b974 8044af63 8040dd2c
> > > > 00000001 804a3490
> > > >             00000001 81000000 0030f231 80148558 00000003 10008400
> > > > 87c1dd80 7599ee13
> > > >             00000000 00000000 804b0000 00000000 00000007 00000000
> > > > 00000085 00000000
> > > >             62722d31 00000084 804b0000 39347874 00000000 804b7820
> > > > 8040cef8 81000010
> > > >             00000001 00000007 00000001 81000000 00000008 8021de24
> > > > 00000000 804a0000
> > > >             ...
> > > >     Call Trace:
> > > >     [<8010adec>] show_stack+0x74/0x104
> > > >     [<801a5e44>] bad_page+0x130/0x138
> > > >     [<801a654c>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x17c/0x3b0
> > > >     [<801a789c>] free_unref_page+0x40/0x68
> > > >     [<801120f4>] free_init_pages+0xec/0x104
> > > >     [<803bdde8>] free_initmem+0x10/0x58
> > > >     [<803bdb8c>] kernel_init+0x20/0x100
> > > >     [<801057c8>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
> > > >     Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
> > > >     BUG: Bad page state in process swapper  pfn:00002
> > > >     [...]
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is not set, so the only relevant part is the
> > > > change quoted below.
> > > >
> > > > > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> > > > > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> > > > > @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > > > >
> > > > >  static void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -       unsigned long reserved_end;
> > > > >         phys_addr_t ramstart = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
> > > > >         int i;
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -382,10 +381,10 @@ static void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > > > >          * will reserve the area used for the initrd.
> > > > >          */
> > > > >         init_initrd();
> > > > > -       reserved_end = (unsigned long) PFN_UP(__pa_symbol(&_end));
> > > > >
> > > > > -       memblock_reserve(PHYS_OFFSET,
> > > > > -                        (reserved_end << PAGE_SHIFT) - PHYS_OFFSET);
> > > > > +       /* Reserve memory occupied by kernel. */
> > > > > +       memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(&_text),
> > > > > +                       __pa_symbol(&_end) - __pa_symbol(&_text));
> > > > >
> > > > >         /*
> > > > >          * max_low_pfn is not a number of pages. The number of pages

> > > > Hence the old code reserved 1 MiB extra at the beginning.
> > > >
> > > > Note that the new code also dropped the rounding up of the memory block
> > > > size to a multiple of PAGE_SIZE. I'm not sure the latter actually
> > > > matters or not.
> > >
> > > I'd say that bad page state for pfn 1 is caused by "freeing" the first 1M.
> >
> > Yes, by prom_free_prom_memory(), as pointed out by Serge.
>
> I wonder how other MIPS variants would react to the fact that the memory
> below the kernel is not reserved ;-)

Exactly...

Looks like at least arch/mips/dec/prom/memory.c needs a similar but\
more complicated fix, due to declance handling...


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds