lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 03:02:25 -0700 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu> To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, jmoyer@...hat.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, amakhalov@...are.com, anishs@...are.com, srivatsab@...are.com Subject: Re: CFQ idling kills I/O performance on ext4 with blkio cgroup controller On 5/22/19 2:12 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > >> Il giorno 22 mag 2019, alle ore 11:02, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu> ha scritto: >> >> >> Let's continue here on LKML itself. > > Just done :) > >> The only reason I created the >> bugzilla entry is to attach the tarball of the traces, assuming >> that it would allow me to upload a 20 MB file (since email attachment >> didn't work). But bugzilla's file restriction is much smaller than >> that, so it didn't work out either, and I resorted to using dropbox. >> So we don't need the bugzilla entry anymore; I might as well close it >> to avoid confusion. >> > > No no, don't close it: it can reach people that don't use LKML. We > just have to remember to report back at the end of this. Ah, good point! > BTW, I also > think that the bug is incorrectly filed against 5.1, while all these > tests and results concern 5.2-rcX. > Fixed now, thank you for pointing out! Regards, Srivatsa VMware Photon OS
Powered by blists - more mailing lists