[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190522112329.GA25483@er01809n.ebgroup.elektrobit.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:23:37 +0000
From: "Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>
To: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>,
"Jordan, Tobias" <Tobias.Jordan@...ktrobit.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: mlockall error for flag MCL_ONFAULT
If mlockall() is called with only MCL_ONFAULT as flag,
it removes any previously applied lockings and does
nothing else.
This behavior is counter-intuitive and doesn't match the
Linux man page.
Consequently, return the error EINVAL, if only MCL_ONFAULT
is passed. That way, applications will at least detect that
they are calling mlockall() incorrectly.
Fixes: b0f205c2a308 ("mm: mlock: add mlock flags to enable VM_LOCKONFAULT usage")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Potyra <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>
---
Sparse shows a warning for mlock.c, but it is not related to
this patch.
mm/mlock.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
index e492a155c51a..03f39cbdd4c4 100644
--- a/mm/mlock.c
+++ b/mm/mlock.c
@@ -797,7 +797,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(mlockall, int, flags)
unsigned long lock_limit;
int ret;
- if (!flags || (flags & ~(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE | MCL_ONFAULT)))
+ if (!flags || (flags & ~(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE | MCL_ONFAULT)) ||
+ flags == MCL_ONFAULT)
return -EINVAL;
if (!can_do_mlock())
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists