linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: sync buffer when mapping FROM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6cbe5470-16a6-17e9-337d-6ba18b16b6e8@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 13:50:47 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
Cc:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: sync buffer when mapping FROM_DEVICE

On 22/05/2019 13:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'm a little worried about this.  While it looks functionally correct
> we have surived without it, and doing another copy for every swiotlb
> dma mapping from the device looks extremely painful for the typical use
> cases where we expect the device to transfer the whole mapping.
> 
> I'd be tempted to instead properl document the current behavior and
> introduce a new DMA_ATTR_PARTIAL flag to allow for partial mappings.

Would that work out any different from the existing 
DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC? If drivers are prepared to handle this issue 
from their end, they can already do so for single mappings by using that 
attr along with explicit partial syncs via dma_sync_single(). For 
page/sg mappings we'd still have the problem of identifying what part of 
"partial" actually matters, and probably having to add some additional 
new sync operations to cope.

Robin.