[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190522132250.26499-5-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:22:36 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
will.deacon@....com
Cc: aou@...s.berkeley.edu, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, davem@...emloft.net, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, jhogan@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
mark.rutland@....com, mattst88@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, palmer@...ive.com, paul.burton@...s.com,
paulus@...ba.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, rth@...ddle.net,
stable@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, tony.luck@...el.com,
vgupta@...opsys.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/18] locking/atomic: alpha: use s64 for atomic64
As a step towards making the atomic64 API use consistent types treewide,
let's have the alpha atomic64 implementation use s64 as the underlying
type for atomic64_t, rather than long, matching the generated headers.
As atomic64_read() depends on the generic defintion of atomic64_t, this
still returns long. This will be converted in a subsequent patch.
Otherwise, there should be no functional change as a result of this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
---
arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h
index 150a1c5d6a2c..2144530d1428 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_##op##_relaxed(int i, atomic_t *v) \
}
#define ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op) \
-static __inline__ void atomic64_##op(long i, atomic64_t * v) \
+static __inline__ void atomic64_##op(s64 i, atomic64_t * v) \
{ \
- unsigned long temp; \
+ s64 temp; \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: ldq_l %0,%1\n" \
" " #asm_op " %0,%2,%0\n" \
@@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ static __inline__ void atomic64_##op(long i, atomic64_t * v) \
} \
#define ATOMIC64_OP_RETURN(op, asm_op) \
-static __inline__ long atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(long i, atomic64_t * v) \
+static __inline__ s64 atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(s64 i, atomic64_t * v) \
{ \
- long temp, result; \
+ s64 temp, result; \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: ldq_l %0,%1\n" \
" " #asm_op " %0,%3,%2\n" \
@@ -128,9 +128,9 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_##op##_return_relaxed(long i, atomic64_t * v) \
}
#define ATOMIC64_FETCH_OP(op, asm_op) \
-static __inline__ long atomic64_fetch_##op##_relaxed(long i, atomic64_t * v) \
+static __inline__ s64 atomic64_fetch_##op##_relaxed(s64 i, atomic64_t * v) \
{ \
- long temp, result; \
+ s64 temp, result; \
__asm__ __volatile__( \
"1: ldq_l %2,%1\n" \
" " #asm_op " %2,%3,%0\n" \
@@ -246,9 +246,9 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_fetch_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
* Atomically adds @a to @v, so long as it was not @u.
* Returns the old value of @v.
*/
-static __inline__ long atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
+static __inline__ s64 atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, s64 a, s64 u)
{
- long c, new, old;
+ s64 c, new, old;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ldq_l %[old],%[mem]\n"
@@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_fetch_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
* The function returns the old value of *v minus 1, even if
* the atomic variable, v, was not decremented.
*/
-static inline long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
+static inline s64 atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
{
- long old, tmp;
+ s64 old, tmp;
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__(
"1: ldq_l %[old],%[mem]\n"
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists