linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] docs: Deal with some Sphinx deprecation warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 09:45:59 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] docs: Deal with some Sphinx deprecation
 warnings

On Wed, 22 May 2019 15:25:36 +0200
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de> wrote:

> Lets use 1.7 :
> 
> - no need for Use_SSI wrapper
> - new log should work with 1.7 [1] --> no need for kernellog.py and
>    additional imports, instead include on top of python modules ::
> 
>      from sphinx.util import logging
>      logger = logging.getLogger('kerneldoc')

I think we're going to have to drag things forward at some point in the
not-too-distant future, but I think I'd rather not do that quite yet.  The
cost of supporting older sphinx for a few releases while we warn people is
not all that high.  So I think we should:

 - Put in (a future version of) my hacks for now, plus whatever else might
   be needed to make 2.0 work right.

 - Fix the fallout with regard to out-of-toctree .rst files so that we can
   actually build again with current sphinx.

 - Update Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt to ask for something a wee
   bit more recent than 1.4.9.

 - Add a warning when building with an older version that (say) 1.7 will
   be required as of (say) 5.5.

Does this make sense?

Thanks,

jon