[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJiuCcdaZVLQyupEf8HPaUySakufXXAhzundo6VeyQaAyZ8Trw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:15:26 +0200
From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: watchdog: add Allwinner H6 r_watchdog
Hi Maxime,
On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 12:32, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 06:03:28PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote:
> > Allwinner H6 has a second watchdog on the r-blocks which is
> > compatible with the A31.
> >
> > This commit add the H6 compatible for the r_watchdog.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
>
> Unless you have some evidence that the two blocks are different, then
> you should just reuse the same one.
I have no evidence it's different nor identical, it's not documented
in the user manual.
I thought it would better to have separate bindings in case there is a
difference.
Than don't have and find later that we have to introduce one.
But as you prefer.
Regards,
Clément
>
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists