linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Document Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF MFD bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVBF82cUYFR3+K1bKhK16qCxNhyFXykp2c_CLffUq4i1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 19:44:48 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:     Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, juliensu@...c.com.tw,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, zhengxunli@...c.com.tw,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Document Renesas R-Car Gen3
 RPC-IF MFD bindings

Hi Sergei,

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 7:23 PM Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
> On 05/22/2019 08:05 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On 05/20/2019 10:23 AM, masonccyang@...c.com.tw wrote:
> >>> +- clocks: should contain 1 entries for the module's clock
> >>
> >>    1 entry (clock node phandle and specifier).
> >
> > Doesn't "specifier" mean "phandle + optional arguments"?
>
>    No.
>    E.g. when specifying the IRQs, the "interrupts" prop contains one or more
> interrupt specifiers, the phandle is specified in the "interrupt-parent"
> prop (see the DT spec).

Mea culpa, I stand corrected.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds