[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190522111916.b99a18d67bc76f7cf207d9e6@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 11:19:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmap: move BUG_ON() check to the unlink_va()
On Wed, 22 May 2019 17:09:39 +0200 "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
> Move the BUG_ON()/RB_EMPTY_NODE() check under unlink_va()
> function, it means if an empty node gets freed it is a BUG
> thus is considered as faulty behaviour.
So... this is an expansion of the assertion's coverage?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists