linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between LEDs, MFD and REGULATOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190522190225.GH8582@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 20:02:25 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between LEDs, MFD and REGULATOR

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 08:27:32PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 5/21/19 11:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:30:38PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:

> > >        regulator: lm363x: Make the gpio register enable flexible
> > >        regulator: lm363x: Add support for LM36274

> > Why have these been applied, I haven't reviewed them?  As far as I can
> > tell they were sent before the merge window so I'd expect a resend at
> > this point...

> The patch set have been floating around for some time and besides

Most of that time as far as I can tell they weren't being posted to
subsystem maintainers, you can't expect people to be aware of patches
that they are not being sent and single postings get missed or dropped
for all sorts of reasons.

> the v2 you were cc'ed by Dan, I also poked you a week ago for v4 [1].

That post from a week ago was you copying me into a thread I wasn't CCed
on saying I should have been sent the patches.  My expectation would
therefore be that someone would send me the patches, I'm obviously going
to prioritize patches that actually get sent to me over ones where I
have to go searching to try to turn up copies.

> Don't be surprised that I assumed you simply don't care.

You have unreasonable expectations here.  At the very least I would have
expected something along the lines of "hey, you don't seem to have
looked at these" before you just applied things, and ideally ensuring
that the patches had actually been sent to everyone with a reasonable
lead time so there was a good chance that review could happen.

> Still, we're awaiting your comments

If someone sends me the patches...

> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/10/547
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/14/717

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)