[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAARK3HnTkpkH9rP4oW456V6KYsCah7-gAXdjm5+3cLwJaPs6tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 10:28:58 +0530
From: Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, peter@...sgaard.com,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround
for FU540-C000 SoC.
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 7:24 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > static void ocores_process_polling(struct ocores_i2c *i2c)
> > {
> > + const struct of_device_id *match;
> > +
> > + match = of_match_node(ocores_i2c_match, i2c->adap.dev.of_node);
> > +
> > while (1) {
> > irqreturn_t ret;
> > int err;
>
> Please keep with the idea of i2c->flags, which is set during probe.
> Just because it was removed because it was no longer needed does not
> stop you from putting it back again if it is needed.
>
I had modified the implementation, so as to keep it compatible with
the new implementation of polling mode.
As per your suggestion, I will keep the older method (the v5 version
which you Reviewed earlier : https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/20/1261)
and submit a v7 for this.
> Andrew
Thanks & Regards,
Sagar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists