linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 080/114] dm integrity: correctly calculate the size of metadata area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190523181738.973182902@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 21:06:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 080/114] dm integrity: correctly calculate the size of metadata area

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>

commit 30bba430ddf737978e40561198693ba91386dac1 upstream.

When we use separate devices for data and metadata, dm-integrity would
incorrectly calculate the size of the metadata device as if it had
512-byte block size - and it would refuse activation with larger block
size and smaller metadata device.

Fix this so that it takes actual block size into account, which fixes
the following reported issue:
https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/issues/450

Fixes: 356d9d52e122 ("dm integrity: allow separate metadata device")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -2557,7 +2557,7 @@ static int calculate_device_limits(struc
 		if (last_sector < ic->start || last_sector >= ic->meta_device_sectors)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	} else {
-		__u64 meta_size = ic->provided_data_sectors * ic->tag_size;
+		__u64 meta_size = (ic->provided_data_sectors >> ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block) * ic->tag_size;
 		meta_size = (meta_size + ((1U << (ic->log2_buffer_sectors + SECTOR_SHIFT)) - 1))
 				>> (ic->log2_buffer_sectors + SECTOR_SHIFT);
 		meta_size <<= ic->log2_buffer_sectors;
@@ -3428,7 +3428,7 @@ try_smaller_buffer:
 	DEBUG_print("	journal_sections %u\n", (unsigned)le32_to_cpu(ic->sb->journal_sections));
 	DEBUG_print("	journal_entries %u\n", ic->journal_entries);
 	DEBUG_print("	log2_interleave_sectors %d\n", ic->sb->log2_interleave_sectors);
-	DEBUG_print("	device_sectors 0x%llx\n", (unsigned long long)ic->device_sectors);
+	DEBUG_print("	data_device_sectors 0x%llx\n", (unsigned long long)ic->data_device_sectors);
 	DEBUG_print("	initial_sectors 0x%x\n", ic->initial_sectors);
 	DEBUG_print("	metadata_run 0x%x\n", ic->metadata_run);
 	DEBUG_print("	log2_metadata_run %d\n", ic->log2_metadata_run);