[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190523181735.408177139@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 21:06:50 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 122/139] bpf: Fix preempt_enable_no_resched() abuse
[ Upstream commit 0edd6b64d1939e9e9168ff27947995bb7751db5d ]
Unless the very next line is schedule(), or implies it, one must not use
preempt_enable_no_resched(). It can cause a preemption to go missing and
thereby cause arbitrary delays, breaking the PREEMPT=y invariant.
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index e734f163bd0b9..1fbd7672e4b37 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ int bpf_prog_array_copy(struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array,
} \
_out: \
rcu_read_unlock(); \
- preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
+ preempt_enable(); \
_ret; \
})
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists