linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Statically allocate mce_banks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190523213704.GB3980@cz.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 23:37:04 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc:     "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE: Statically allocate mce_banks_array

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 07:23:08PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Sure, but which patch are you referring to?
> 
> This seems to fix a patch in the set in bp/rc0+3-ras.

Sorry, I got confused. So bp/rc0+3-ras is not cast in stone - feel free
to take it and merge this change into 5b0883f5c7be ("x86/MCE: Make
mce_banks a per-CPU array") and then fix up any potential conflicts
coming from the following patches. And then send the whole pile as a new
revision.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. Srsly.