lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 08:45:34 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...hat.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] docs: fix numaperf.rst and add it to the doc tree

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:50:29PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Commit 13bac55ef7ae ("doc/mm: New documentation for memory performance")
> added numaperf.rst, but did not add it to the TOC tree.  There was also an
> incorrectly marked literal block leading to this warning sequence:
> 
>   numaperf.rst:24: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
>   numaperf.rst:24: WARNING: Inline substitution_reference start-string without end-string.
>   numaperf.rst:25: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> 
> Fix the block and add the file to the document tree.
> 
> Fixes: 13bac55ef7ae ("doc/mm: New documentation for memory performance")
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/mm/index.rst    | 1 +
>  Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/index.rst
> index 8edb35f11317..ddf8d8d33377 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/index.rst
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ the Linux memory management.
>     ksm
>     memory-hotplug
>     numa_memory_policy
> +   numaperf
>     pagemap
>     soft-dirty
>     transhuge
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
> index b79f70c04397..c067ed145158 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ characteristics.  Some memory may share the same node as a CPU, and others
>  are provided as memory only nodes. While memory only nodes do not provide
>  CPUs, they may still be local to one or more compute nodes relative to
>  other nodes. The following diagram shows one such example of two compute
> -nodes with local memory and a memory only node for each of compute node:
> +nodes with local memory and a memory only node for each of compute node::
>  
>   +------------------+     +------------------+
>   | Compute Node 0   +-----+ Compute Node 1   |
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ