linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] scripts/spelling.txt: Add spelling fix for prohibited

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB2285F1CD8540CBC4795D8708B7010@TYAPR01MB2285.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 09:07:51 +0000
From:   Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] scripts/spelling.txt: Add spelling fix for prohibited

Hello Stephen,

> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Sent: 21 May 2019 19:02
> 
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2019-05-21 01:57:20)
> > Hi Stephen, Andrew,
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Guess so! Or Andrew does it.
> >
> > Given the change to scripts/spelling.txt conflicts with b937856a5db2cb7a
> > ("scripts/spelling.txt: add more typos to spelling.txt and sort") in
> > linux-next, and the risk of conflict with future changes to
> > drivers/clk/renesas/r8a77470-cpg-mssr.c is slim, I'd like to defer this
> > to Andrew.
> >
> > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> 
> Ok. Or Chris can split the patch into the clk part and the scripts/
> part?  They're only loosely related to each other, so I'm not sure why
> they were sent in one patch besides for ease of transport.

Happy to split the patch if you want. I combined the patch as I saw that done in a couple of examples in the git log.

However, I got an automated email from akpm saying that this patch was added to the -mm tree; so I don't know if you still want me to split up this patch or not.
Let me know.

Kind regards, Chris