linux-kernel - Re: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 20:58:47 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Tim Bird <tbird20d@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Carpenter,Dan" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, willy@...radead.org,
        gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, knut.omang@...cle.com
Subject: Re: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC

On Wed, 22 May 2019 14:02:31 -0700
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:

> Cool, so do we just want to go with that? Have a single slot for KUnit
> and KTF combined?
> 
> We can each present our work up to this point; maybe offer some
> background and rationale on why we made the decision we have and then we
> can have some moderated discussion on, pros, cons, next steps, etc?
> 

You have till the end of today to submit a Refereed talk if you want to
present. Otherwise, Microconferences should only have 5 to 10 minutes
to present what they want to discuss before a discussion should
proceed. If you need more than 10 minutes to give your point, then you
need to try to get a Refereed talk in, and that will give you a full 40
minutes.

-- Steve