linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] KVM: selftests: Move kvm_create_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190523175638.5sc5zjbgsqe4bkes@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 19:56:38 +0200
From:   Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] KVM: selftests: Move kvm_create_max_vcpus test to
 generic code

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:43:09PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> There is nothing x86-specific in the test apart from the VM_MODE_P52V48_4K
> which we can now replace with VM_MODE_DEFAULT. Thus let's move the file to
> the main folder and enable it for aarch64 and s390x, too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile                          | 4 +++-
>  .../testing/selftests/kvm/{x86_64 => }/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  rename tools/testing/selftests/kvm/{x86_64 => }/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c (93%)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index d8beb990c8f4..aef5bd1166cf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -21,15 +21,17 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/evmcs_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/hyperv_cpuid
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_close_while_nested_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/smm_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/kvm_create_max_vcpus
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += clear_dirty_log_test
>  
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += clear_dirty_log_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>  
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>  
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(UNAME_M))
>  LIBKVM += $(LIBKVM_$(UNAME_M))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> similarity index 93%
> rename from tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> rename to tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> index 50e92996f918..db78ce07c416 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/kvm_create_max_vcpus.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  /*
>   * kvm_create_max_vcpus
>   *
> @@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ void test_vcpu_creation(int first_vcpu_id, int num_vcpus)
>  	printf("Testing creating %d vCPUs, with IDs %d...%d.\n",
>  	       num_vcpus, first_vcpu_id, first_vcpu_id + num_vcpus - 1);
>  
> -	vm = vm_create(VM_MODE_P52V48_4K, DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES, O_RDWR);
> +	vm = vm_create(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES, O_RDWR);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < num_vcpus; i++) {
>  		int vcpu_id = first_vcpu_id + i;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>