linux-kernel - Re: xarray breaks thrashing detection and cgroup isolation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 11:37:13 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: xarray breaks thrashing detection and cgroup isolation

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:43:49PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> I noticed that recent upstream kernels don't account the xarray nodes
> of the page cache to the allocating cgroup, like we used to do for the
> radix tree nodes.
> 
> This results in broken isolation for cgrouped apps, allowing them to
> escape their containment and harm other cgroups and the system with an
> excessive build-up of nonresident information.
> 
> It also breaks thrashing/refault detection because the page cache
> lives in a different domain than the xarray nodes, and so the shadow
> shrinker can reclaim nonresident information way too early when there
> isn't much cache in the root cgroup.
>
> I'm not quite sure how to fix this, since the xarray code doesn't seem
> to have per-tree gfp flags anymore like the radix tree did. We cannot
> add SLAB_ACCOUNT to the radix_tree_node_cachep slab cache. And the
> xarray api doesn't seem to really support gfp flags, either (xas_nomem
> does, but the optimistic internal allocations have fixed gfp flags).

Would it be a problem to always add __GFP_ACCOUNT to the fixed flags?
I don't really understand cgroups.