[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c2bd6af-92c5-2458-dc41-1ea413545347@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 14:09:49 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 6/6] leds: lm36274: Introduce the TI LM36274 LED
driver
Pavel
Thanks for the review
On 5/23/19 7:50 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lm36274.c
>
>> +static int lm36274_parse_dt(struct lm36274 *lm36274_data)
>> +{
>> + struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
>> + char label[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE];
>> + struct device *dev = &lm36274_data->pdev->dev;
>> + const char *name;
>> + int child_cnt;
>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* There should only be 1 node */
>> + child_cnt = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
>> + if (child_cnt != 1)
>> + return ret;
>
> I'd do explicit "return -EINVAL" here.
>
ACK
>> +static int lm36274_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct ti_lmu *lmu = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>> + struct lm36274 *lm36274_data;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + lm36274_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lm36274_data),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!lm36274_data) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> And certainly do "return -ENOMEM" explicitly here.
>
ACK
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Pavel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists