linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: Remove Linuxisms from common-properties binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190524213852.GA10241@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 16:38:52 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: Remove Linuxisms from
 common-properties binding

On Tue, 14 May 2019 13:40:51 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We shouldn't reference Linux kernel functions or Linux itself in proper
> bindings. It's OK to reference functions in the kernel when explaining
> examples, but otherwise we shouldn't reference functions to describe
> what the binding means.
> 
> Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/common-properties.txt   | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks.

Rob