linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] close

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 May 2019 00:45:49 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] close_range()

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:27:40AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> What about orthogonality of interfaces?
> 
> 	fdmap()
> 	bulk_close()
> 
> Now fdmap() can be reused for lsof/criu and it is only 2 system calls
> for close-everything usecase which is OK because readdir is 4(!) minimum:
> 
> 	open
> 	getdents
> 	getdents() = 0
> 	close
> 
> Writing all of this I understood how fdmap can be made more faster which
> neither getdents() nor even read() have the luxury of: it can return
> a flag if more data is available so that application would do next fdmap()
> only if truly necessary.

Tactless question: what has traumatised you so badly about string operations?
Because that seems to be the common denominator to a lot of things...