linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=J_RkEByD1ToX1Y2MwkwrCdg0SFZKK02jwu_PpyADPoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 06:05:36 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:12 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 14:45:35 +0200
> Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I still prefer the typecast of void *, as that's used a bit more in the
> kernel, but since char * is also used (not as much), I'll leave it. But
> the parenthesis around iter are unnecessary. I'll remove them.

If the preferred style in the kernel is void *, change it on your
side, please! :-) Maybe we should mention it in the coding guidelines.

Cheers,
Miguel