linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround for FU540-C000 SoC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAARK3Hk42cAPwiLiKMRJgau3WesCEtQkpvaG_KwMCfnV6ih3PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 10:35:35 +0530
From:   Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, peter@...sgaard.com,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround
 for FU540-C000 SoC.

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 7:23 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>
> > Ok, Great. Do we need to write to him about this patchset?
>
> Nope. Hint: You can dig in the mail archives studying older patches to
> see how things work. I do this as well because things may work
> differently per subsystem.
>

Thanks Wolfram for confirming on this.
I will do check in the mail archives for additional info.

Regards,
Sagar Kadam