[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB348566DBD83A4FE5B9B5E42598020@VI1PR0402MB3485.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 06:52:20 +0000
From: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: caam - fix pkcs1pad(rsa-caam, sha256)
failure because of invalid input
On 5/23/2019 3:38 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:02:41AM +0000, Horia Geanta wrote:
>>
>> When crypto_register_akcipher fails, it merely prints a warning and falls
>> through (does not immediately return), thus there's no leak.
>
> How can this work? Wouldn't the exit path then unregister a bunch of
> unregistered algorithms and crash?
>
You're actually right.
zero_buffer is leaked in case crypto_register_akcipher fails.
Besides this, there is an existing issue (independent of current patch) with
algorithm registration: algorithms (in fact, rsa) are unregistered even if
registration might have failed.
This should be addressed separately.
Thanks,
Horia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists