linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [btrfs] 302167c50b: fio.write_bw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 15:46:17 +0800
From:   "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "lkp\@01.org" <lkp@...org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [btrfs]  302167c50b:  fio.write_bw_MBps -12.4% regression

"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:

> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:
>
>> Hi, Josef,
>>
>> kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> writes:
>>
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -12.4% regression of fio.write_bw_MBps due to commit:
>>>
>>>
>>> commit: 302167c50b32e7fccc98994a91d40ddbbab04e52 ("btrfs: don't end
>>> the transaction for delayed refs in throttle")
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git pending-fixes
>>>
>>> in testcase: fio-basic
>>> on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 64G memory
>>> with following parameters:
>>>
>>> 	runtime: 300s
>>> 	nr_task: 8t
>>> 	disk: 1SSD
>>> 	fs: btrfs
>>> 	rw: randwrite
>>> 	bs: 4k
>>> 	ioengine: sync
>>> 	test_size: 400g
>>> 	cpufreq_governor: performance
>>> 	ucode: 0xb00002e
>>>
>>> test-description: Fio is a tool that will spawn a number of threads
>>> or processes doing a particular type of I/O action as specified by
>>> the user.
>>> test-url: https://github.com/axboe/fio
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Do you have time to take a look at this regression?
>
> Ping

Ping again.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying