[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 08:24:26 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: biao huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"yt.shen@...iatek.com" <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
"jianguo.zhang@...iatek.comi" <jianguo.zhang@...iatek.comi>,
"boon.leong.ong@...el.com" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size
128/256 in dwmac4
From: biao huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:33:37
> any comments about this patch?
Can you please test your series on top of this one [1] and let me know
the output of :
# ethtool -t eth0
Just to make sure that this patch does not introduce any regressions. The
remaining ones of the series look fine by me!
[1]
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists