[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190524085720.GA13121@e107155-lin>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:57:40 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Otto Sabart <ottosabart@...erm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to
common code.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> > a common place instead of duplicate code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> > Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 23 ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +-----------------------------
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 28 +++
> > include/linux/topology.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)
>
> What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c? That's
> nice for everyone else, but not me :(
>
> Ugh.
>
> Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series? I think we need
> some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
> right?
>
Greg, I am ready to take ownership. Juri the original author of this file
agreed and I have been reviewing this file since Juri first wrote it.
I am happy to submit a patch assuming maintainership for this file, was
just waiting to hear from you when I asked explicitly you and Juri in
last version of the patch when Will wanted someone from ARM to be reviewer
of this file at-least. I am happy to take over as reviewer or maintainer
which ever you prefer.
Sorry if I was not so clear in my earlier mail.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists