linux-kernel - RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 17:44:44 +0800
From:   biao huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "yt.shen@...iatek.com" <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
        "jianguo.zhang@...iatek.comi" <jianguo.zhang@...iatek.comi>,
        "boon.leong.ong@...el.com" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size
 128/256 in dwmac4

Seems I should modify this patch base on
"https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699"

On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 09:24 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: biao huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
> Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:31:44
> 
> > On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:24 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > > From: biao huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
> > > Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:33:37
> > > 
> > > > any comments about this patch?
> > > 
> > > Can you please test your series on top of this one [1] and let me know 
> > > the output of :
> > > # ethtool -t eth0
> > "ethtol -T eth0"? This patch only affect hash table filter, seems no
> > relation to timestamp.
> > > 
execute "ethtool -t eth0", then we got "Cannot test: Operation not
supported", is there any config should be enabled?
> > > Just to make sure that this patch does not introduce any regressions. The 
> > > remaining ones of the series look fine by me!
> > > 
> > > [1] 
> > which one? Did I miss anything here?
> 
> Sorry, my mail client tried to wrap the long link and ended up in a 
> loooong email.
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699
> 
Got it.
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu