[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190524111144.GI2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:11:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/14 v2] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a
series of longs
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:20:02AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> +#define FGRAPH_RET_SIZE (sizeof(struct ftrace_ret_stack))
> +#define FGRAPH_RET_INDEX (ALIGN(FGRAPH_RET_SIZE, sizeof(long)) / sizeof(long))
I think you want to write that like:
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ftrace_ret_stack) % sizeof(long));
It'd be very weird for that sizeof not to be right.
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE)
Do we really need that big a shadow stack?
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_INDEX \
> + (ALIGN(SHADOW_STACK_SIZE, sizeof(long)) / sizeof(long))
> +/* Leave on a buffer at the end */
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_MAX_INDEX (SHADOW_STACK_INDEX - FGRAPH_RET_INDEX)
> +
> +#define RET_STACK(t, index) ((struct ftrace_ret_stack *)(&(t)->ret_stack[index]))
> +#define RET_STACK_INC(c) ({ c += FGRAPH_RET_INDEX; })
> +#define RET_STACK_DEC(c) ({ c -= FGRAPH_RET_INDEX; })
I'm thinking something like:
#define RET_PUSH(s, val) \
do { \
(s) -= sizeof(val); \
(typeof(val) *)(s) = val; \
} while (0)
#define RET_POP(s, type) \
({ \
type *__ptr = (void *)(s); \
(s) += sizeof(type); \
*__ptr; \
})
Would me clearer?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists