[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190524114042.GA360@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 13:40:42 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmw_vmci: Clean up uses of atomic*_set()
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:39:34PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:35:35PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > The primitive vmci_q_set_pointer() relies on atomic*_set() being of
> > type 'void', but this is a non-portable implementation detail.
> >
> > Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h b/include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h
> > index 0c06178e4985b..eb593868e2e9e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h
> > @@ -759,9 +759,9 @@ static inline void vmci_q_set_pointer(atomic64_t *var,
> > u64 new_val)
> > {
> > #if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
> > - return atomic_set((atomic_t *)var, (u32)new_val);
> > + atomic_set((atomic_t *)var, (u32)new_val);
> > #else
> > - return atomic64_set(var, new_val);
> > + atomic64_set(var, new_val);
> > #endif
> > }
>
> All that should just die a horrible death. That code is crap.
>
> See:
>
> lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524103731.GN2606@...ez.programming.kicks-ass.net
I agree, Peter's patch should be the thing that is applied, not this
one.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists