linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmw_vmci: Clean up uses of atomic*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190524115920.GB21365@andrea>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 13:59:20 +0200
From:   Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmw_vmci: Clean up uses of atomic*_set()

> > All that should just die a horrible death. That code is crap.
> > 
> > See:
> > 
> >   lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524103731.GN2606@...ez.programming.kicks-ass.net
> 
> I agree, Peter's patch should be the thing that is applied, not this
> one.

Thanks for the confirmation, Greg.  I'll drop mine.

At this time, it's not clear to me where Peter's patch will be applied,
and where/whether I should rebase 2/2 (if there is interested in that):

Please let me know.

Thanks,
  Andrea