linux-kernel - Re: mm/compaction: BUG: NULL pointer dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190524123047.GO18914@techsingularity.net>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 13:30:47 +0100
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, cai@....pw,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm/compaction: BUG: NULL pointer dereference

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 04:26:16PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/24/2019 02:50 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > We are hitting NULL pointer dereferences while running stress tests with KVM.
> > See splat [0]. The test is to spawn 100 VMs all doing standard debian
> > installation (Thanks to Marc's automated scripts, available here [1] ).
> > The problem has been reproduced with a better rate of success from 5.1-rc6
> > onwards.
> > 
> > The issue is only reproducible with swapping enabled and the entire
> > memory is used up, when swapping heavily. Also this issue is only reproducible
> > on only one server with 128GB, which has the following memory layout:
> > 
> > [32GB@4GB, hole , 96GB@...GB]
> > 
> > Here is my non-expert analysis of the issue so far.
> > 
> > Under extreme memory pressure, the kswapd could trigger reset_isolation_suitable()
> > to figure out the cached values for migrate/free pfn for a zone, by scanning through
> > the entire zone. On our server it does so in the range of [ 0x10_0000, 0xa00_0000 ],
> > with the following area of holes : [ 0x20_0000, 0x880_0000 ].
> > In the failing case, we end up setting the cached migrate pfn as : 0x508_0000, which
> > is right in the center of the zone pfn range. i.e ( 0x10_0000 + 0xa00_0000 ) / 2,
> > with reset_migrate = 0x88_4e00, reset_free = 0x10_0000.
> > 
> > Now these cached values are used by the fast_isolate_freepages() to find a pfn. However,
> > since we cant find anything during the search we fall back to using the page belonging
> > to the min_pfn (which is the migrate_pfn), without proper checks to see if that is valid
> > PFN or not. This is then passed on to fast_isolate_around() which tries to do :
> > set_pageblock_skip(page) on the page which blows up due to an NULL mem_section pointer.
> > 
> > The following patch seems to fix the issue for me, but I am not quite convinced that
> > it is the right fix. Thoughts ?
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > index 9febc8c..9e1b9ac 100644
> > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ fast_isolate_freepages(struct compact_control *cc)
> >  				page = pfn_to_page(highest);
> >  				cc->free_pfn = highest;
> >  			} else {
> > -				if (cc->direct_compaction) {
> > +				if (cc->direct_compaction && pfn_valid(min_pfn)) {
> >  					page = pfn_to_page(min_pfn);
> 
> pfn_to_online_page() here would be better as it does not add pfn_valid() cost on
> architectures which does not subscribe to CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE. But regardless if
> the compaction is trying to scan pfns in zone holes, then it should be avoided.

CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE typically applies in special cases where an arch
punches holes within a section. As both do a section lookup, the cost is
similar but pfn_valid in general is less subtle in this case. Normally
pfn_valid_within is only ok when a pfn_valid check has been made on the
max_order aligned range as well as a zone boundary check. In this case,
it's much more straight-forward to leave it as pfn_valid.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs