[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4e875f0-2aa5-89f4-f462-78bedb9c5cde@filmlight.ltd.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 16:11:14 +0100
From: Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: roger@...mlight.ltd.uk, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kernel.h: Add generic roundup_64() macro
On 23/05/2019 16:27, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> I haven't yet tested this, but what about something like the following:
>
> ...perhaps forget about the constant check, and just force
> the power of two check:
>
> \
> if (!(__y & (__y >> 1))) { \
> __x = round_up(x, y); \
> } else { \
You probably want
if (!(__y & (__y - 1))
--
Roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists