[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9a62423-7f33-8725-3459-24cfb84043a3@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 18:00:10 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/9] genirq/timings: Add selftest for circular array
On 24/05/2019 16:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 01:16:13PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Due to the complexity of the code and the difficulty to debug it,
>> let's add some selftests to the framework in order to spot issues or
>> regression at boot time when the runtime testing is enabled for this
>> subsystem.
>>
>> This tests the circular buffer at the limits and validates:
>> - the encoding / decoding of the values
>> - the macro to browse the irq timings circular buffer
>> - the function to push data in the circular buffer
>
> Can it use kselftest infrastructure?
I don't think it is possible because it is 100% deep-internal test, no
cooperation with userspace.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists