[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd4a85fc-dc56-aae0-4986-003ad4a11ef4@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 19:30:45 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kernel.h: Add generic roundup_64() macro
On 24.05.19 г. 18:26 ч., Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019 16:11:14 +0100
> Roger Willcocks <roger@...mlight.ltd.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 23/05/2019 16:27, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't yet tested this, but what about something like the following:
>>>
>>> ...perhaps forget about the constant check, and just force
>>> the power of two check:
>>>
>>> \
>>> if (!(__y & (__y >> 1))) { \
>>> __x = round_up(x, y); \
>>> } else { \
>>
>> You probably want
>>
>> if (!(__y & (__y - 1))
>>
>> --
>
> Yes I do. I corrected it in my next email.
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190523133648.591f9e78@gandalf.local.home
Or perhaps just using is_power_of_2 from include/linux/log2.h ?
>
>> #define roundup(x, y) ( \
>> { \
>> typeof(y) __y = y; \
>> typeof(x) __x; \
>> \
>> if (__y & (__y - 1)) \
>> __x = round_up(x, __y); \
>> else \
>> __x = (((x) + (__y - 1)) / __y) * __y; \
>> __x; \
>> })
>
>
> -- Steve
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists