lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 10:39:18 +0200 From: Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: kpc2000: add missing dependencies for kpc2000 On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 07:00:17AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:30:58PM +0200, Simon Sandström wrote: > > Fixes build errors: > > > > ERROR: "mfd_remove_devices" [kpc2000.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "uio_unregister_device" [kpc2000.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "mfd_add_devices" [kpc2000.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "__uio_register_device" [kpc2000.ko] undefined! > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu> > > --- > > drivers/staging/kpc2000/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/Kconfig > > index c463d232f2b4..5188b56123ab 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/Kconfig > > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ > > config KPC2000 > > bool "Daktronics KPC Device support" > > depends on PCI > > + select MFD_CORE > > + select UIO > > help > > Select this if you wish to use the Daktronics KPC PCI devices > > > > This is already in linux-next (in a different form), are you sure you > are working against the latest kernel tree? > > thanks, > > greg k-h It's based on your staging tree. I think that I have to go back and read about next trees again, because I thought it took longer time for things to get from staging-next to linux-next. Anyway, neither the MFD_CORE nor the typo fix is in linux-next so I guess that I could just rebase this on linux-next and re-send as v2. I'm not sure if MFD_CORE should be "depends on" or "select" though... - Simon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists