linux-kernel - Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] input: alps-fix the issue the special alps trackpoint do not work.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <721b91b0-f231-5f7d-a438-09dd85f63513@canonical.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 May 2019 09:33:46 +0800
From:   Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>
To:     Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
Cc:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Xiaoxiao Liu <xiaoxiao.liu-1@...alps.com>,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, XiaoXiao Liu <sliuuxiaonxiao@...il.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xiaojian Cao <xiaojian.cao@...alps.com>,
        "zhangfp1@...ovo.com" <zhangfp1@...ovo.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] input: alps-fix the issue the special alps trackpoint do not work.


On 2019/5/24 下午6:58, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:43:58PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote:
>> On 2019/5/24 下午5:37, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:37:57PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote:
>>>>
>> OK, that is sth we need to do.  But anyway it is a bit risky to backport
>> that much code and the whole folder of quirks to libinput 1.10.4,  we need
>> to do lots of test to make sure there is no regression on other machines.
>>
>> Probably we only need to keep the quirks/30-vendor-alps.quirks to 1.10.4 and
>> drop other quirks, that will be better for our testing effort.
> might be worth looking at what is in 1.10.7, e.g.  a3b3e85c0e looks like it
> may be of interest. That one suggests the range on some ALPS devices is over
> 100, so testing with 5-25 may really not have had any effect.

Oh, looks exactly the same as our issue, will have a try with it.

Thanks,

Hui.


>
> Cheers,
>     Peter
>