lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 09:33:46 +0800 From: Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com> To: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net> Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>, Xiaoxiao Liu <xiaoxiao.liu-1@...alps.com>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, XiaoXiao Liu <sliuuxiaonxiao@...il.com>, "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Xiaojian Cao <xiaojian.cao@...alps.com>, "zhangfp1@...ovo.com" <zhangfp1@...ovo.com> Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] input: alps-fix the issue the special alps trackpoint do not work. On 2019/5/24 下午6:58, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 06:43:58PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote: >> On 2019/5/24 下午5:37, Peter Hutterer wrote: >>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:37:57PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote: >>>> >> OK, that is sth we need to do. But anyway it is a bit risky to backport >> that much code and the whole folder of quirks to libinput 1.10.4, we need >> to do lots of test to make sure there is no regression on other machines. >> >> Probably we only need to keep the quirks/30-vendor-alps.quirks to 1.10.4 and >> drop other quirks, that will be better for our testing effort. > might be worth looking at what is in 1.10.7, e.g. a3b3e85c0e looks like it > may be of interest. That one suggests the range on some ALPS devices is over > 100, so testing with 5-25 may really not have had any effect. Oh, looks exactly the same as our issue, will have a try with it. Thanks, Hui. > > Cheers, > Peter >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists