lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <259803076.m90EgR4Zsz@jernej-laptop>
Date:   Sat, 25 May 2019 21:50:51 +0200
From:   Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To:     linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, robin.murphy@....com
Cc:     Rob Herring <rob.e.herring@...il.com>,
        Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Allwinner H6 Mali GPU support

Hi!

Dne četrtek, 16. maj 2019 ob 13:19:06 CEST je Robin Murphy napisal(a):
> On 16/05/2019 00:22, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 5:06 PM Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com> 
wrote:
> >> Hi Robin,
> >> 
> >> On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 23:57, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
> >>> On 2019-05-14 10:22 pm, Clément Péron wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 17:17, Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com> 
wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 12:29, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> 
wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 13/05/2019 17:14, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 07:46:00PM +0200, peron.clem@...il.com 
wrote:
> >>>>>>>> From: Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> The Allwinner H6 has a Mali-T720 MP2. The drivers are
> >>>>>>>> out-of-tree so this series only introduce the dt-bindings.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> We do have an in-tree midgard driver now (since 5.2). Does this
> >>>>>>> stuff work
> >>>>>>> together with your dt changes here?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> No, but it should be easy to add.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I will give it a try and let you know.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Added the bus_clock and a ramp delay to the gpu_vdd but the driver
> >>>> fail at probe.
> >>>> 
> >>>> [    3.052919] panfrost 1800000.gpu: clock rate = 432000000
> >>>> [    3.058278] panfrost 1800000.gpu: bus_clock rate = 100000000
> >>>> [    3.179772] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mali-t720 id 0x720 major 0x1
> >>>> minor 0x1 status 0x0
> >>>> [    3.187432] panfrost 1800000.gpu: features: 00000000,10309e40,
> >>>> issues: 00000000,21054400
> >>>> [    3.195531] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Features: L2:0x07110206
> >>>> Shader:0x00000000 Tiler:0x00000809 Mem:0x1 MMU:0x00002821 AS:0xf
> >>>> JS:0x7
> >>>> [    3.207178] panfrost 1800000.gpu: shader_present=0x3 l2_present=0x1
> >>>> [    3.238257] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Fatal error during GPU init
> >>>> [    3.244165] panfrost: probe of 1800000.gpu failed with error -12
> >>>> 
> >>>> The ENOMEM is coming from "panfrost_mmu_init"
> >>>> alloc_io_pgtable_ops(ARM_MALI_LPAE, &pfdev->mmu->pgtbl_cfg,
> >>>> 
> >>>>                                            pfdev);
> >>>> 
> >>>> Which is due to a check in the pgtable alloc "cfg->ias != 48"
> >>>> arm-lpae io-pgtable: arm_mali_lpae_alloc_pgtable cfg->ias 33 cfg->oas
> >>>> 40
> >>>> 
> >>>> DRI stack is totally new for me, could you give me a little clue about
> >>>> this issue ?
> >>> 
> >>> Heh, this is probably the one bit which doesn't really count as "DRI
> >>> stack".
> >>> 
> >>> That's merely a somewhat-conservative sanity check - I'm pretty sure it
> >>> *should* be fine to change the test to "cfg->ias > 48" (io-pgtable
> >>> itself ought to cope). You'll just get to be the first to actually test
> >>> a non-48-bit configuration here :)
> >> 
> >> Thanks a lot, the probe seems fine now :)
> >> 
> >> I try to run glmark2 :
> >> # glmark2-es2-drm
> >> =======================================================
> >> 
> >>      glmark2 2017.07
> >> 
> >> =======================================================
> >> 
> >>      OpenGL Information
> >>      GL_VENDOR:     panfrost
> >>      GL_RENDERER:   panfrost
> >>      GL_VERSION:    OpenGL ES 2.0 Mesa 19.1.0-rc2
> >> 
> >> =======================================================
> >> [build] use-vbo=false:
> >> 
> >> But it seems that H6 is not so easy to add :(.
> >> 
> >> [  345.204813] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mmu irq status=1
> >> [  345.209617] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at VA
> >> 0x0000000002400400
> >> [  345.209617] Reason: TODO
> >> [  345.209617] raw fault status: 0x800002C1
> >> [  345.209617] decoded fault status: SLAVE FAULT
> >> [  345.209617] exception type 0xC1: TRANSLATION_FAULT_LEVEL1
> >> [  345.209617] access type 0x2: READ
> >> [  345.209617] source id 0x8000
> >> [  345.729957] panfrost 1800000.gpu: gpu sched timeout, js=0,
> >> status=0x8, head=0x2400400, tail=0x2400400, sched_job=000000009e204de9
> >> [  346.055876] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mmu irq status=1
> >> [  346.060680] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at VA
> >> 0x0000000002C00A00
> >> [  346.060680] Reason: TODO
> >> [  346.060680] raw fault status: 0x810002C1
> >> [  346.060680] decoded fault status: SLAVE FAULT
> >> [  346.060680] exception type 0xC1: TRANSLATION_FAULT_LEVEL1
> >> [  346.060680] access type 0x2: READ
> >> [  346.060680] source id 0x8100
> >> [  346.561955] panfrost 1800000.gpu: gpu sched timeout, js=1,
> >> status=0x8, head=0x2c00a00, tail=0x2c00a00, sched_job=00000000b55a9a85
> >> [  346.573913] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mmu irq status=1
> >> [  346.578707] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at VA
> >> 0x0000000002C00B80
> >> [  346.578707] Reason: TODO
> >> [  346.578707] raw fault status: 0x800002C1
> >> [  346.578707] decoded fault status: SLAVE FAULT
> >> [  346.578707] exception type 0xC1: TRANSLATION_FAULT_LEVEL1
> >> [  346.578707] access type 0x2: READ
> >> [  346.578707] source id 0x8000
> >> [  347.073947] panfrost 1800000.gpu: gpu sched timeout, js=0,
> >> status=0x8, head=0x2c00b80, tail=0x2c00b80, sched_job=00000000cf6af8e8
> >> [  347.104125] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mmu irq status=1
> >> [  347.108930] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at VA
> >> 0x0000000002800900
> >> [  347.108930] Reason: TODO
> >> [  347.108930] raw fault status: 0x810002C1
> >> [  347.108930] decoded faultn thi status: SLAVE FAULT
> >> [  347.108930] exception type 0xC1: TRANSLATION_FAULT_LEVEL1
> >> [  347.108930] access type 0x2: READ
> >> [  347.108930] source id 0x8100
> >> [  347.617950] panfrost 1800000.gpu: gpu sched timeout, js=1,
> >> status=0x8, head=0x2800900, tail=0x2800900, sched_job=000000009325fdb7
> >> [  347.629902] panfrost 1800000.gpu: mmu irq status=1
> >> [  347.634696] panfrost 1800000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at VA
> >> 0x0000000002800A80
> > 
> > Is this 32 or 64 bit userspace? I think 64-bit does not work with
> > T7xx. You might need this[1].
> 
> [ Oooh... that makes T620 actually do stuff without falling over
> dereferencing VA 0 somewhere halfway through the job chain :D
> 
> I shall continue to play... ]
> 
> > You may also be the first to try T720,
> > so it could be something else.
> 
> I was expecting to see a similar behaviour to my T620 (which I now
> assume was down to 64-bit job descriptors sort-of-but-not-quite working)
> but this does look a bit more fundamental - the fact that it's a level 1
> fault with VA == head == tail suggests to me that the MMU can't see the
> page tables at all to translate anything. I really hope that the H6 GPU
> integration doesn't suffer from the same DMA offset as the Allwinner
> display pipeline stuff, because that would be a real pain to support in
> io-pgtable.

DMA offset is present only on early SoCs with DE1. DE2 and DE3 (used on H6) 
have no offset.

Best regards,
Jernej



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ