linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net 1/4] net/udp_gso: Allow TX timestamp with UDP GSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4B6F9771-011B-4BEC-8454-4D324856DDF6@appneta.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 May 2019 13:47:47 -0700
From:   Fred Klassen <fklassen@...neta.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] net/udp_gso: Allow TX timestamp with UDP GSO



> On May 23, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:what exactly is the issue with IP_TOS?
> 
> If I understand correctly, the issue here is that the new 'P' option
> that polls on the error queue times out. This is unrelated to
> specifying TOS bits? Without zerocopy or timestamps, no message is
> expected on the error queue.

Please disregard last message. I think I was chasing a non-issue with
TOS bits. I will remove all references to TOS.