linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Use fault_in_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 26 May 2019 12:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Use fault_in_pages_writeable() for
 pre-faulting

On Sun, 26 May 2019, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-05-26 19:33:25 [+0200], To Hugh Dickins wrote:
> From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> …
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> 
> Hugh, I took your patch, slapped a signed-off-by line. Please say that
> you are fine with it (or object otherwise).

I'm fine with it, thanks Sebastian. Sorry if I wasted your time by not
giving it my sign-off in the first place, but I was not comfortable to
dabble there without your sign-off too - which it now has. (And thought
you might already have your own version anyway: just provided mine as
illustration, so that we could be sure of exactly what I'd been testing.)

Hugh