[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgzKzAwS=_ySikL1f=Gr62YXL_WXGh82wZKMOvzJ9+2VA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 13:49:16 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Junio Hamano C <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Git List Mailing <git@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for Linux 5.2-rc2
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:53 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The interesting thing is that not only git will treat lightweight tags
> like, well, tags:
Yeah, that's very much by design - lightweight tags are very
comvenient for local temporary stuff where you don't want signing etc
(think automated test infrastructure, or just local reminders).
> In addition, because I _locally_ had a tag object that
> pointed to the same commit and had the same name, git-request-pull
> included my local tag's message in its output! I wonder if this could
> be considered a bug.
Yeah, I think git request-pull should at least *warn* about the tag
not being the same object locally as in the remote you're asking me to
pull.
Are you sure you didn't get a warning, and just missed it? But adding
Junio and the Git list just as a possible heads-up for this in case
git request-pull really only compares the object the tag points to,
rather than the SHA1 of the tag itself.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists