[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190526212213.5944-1-urezki@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 23:22:09 +0200
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Some cleanups for the KVA/vmalloc
Patch [1] removes an unused argument "node" from the __alloc_vmap_area()
function and that is it.
Patch [2] is not driven by any particular workload that fails or so,
it is just better approach to handle one specific split case.
Patch [3] some cleanups in merging path. Basically on a first step
the mergeable node is detached and there is no reason to "unlink" it.
The same concerns the second step unless it has been merged on first
one.
Patch [4] moves BUG_ON()/RB_EMPTY_NODE() checks under "unlink" logic.
After [3] merging path "unlink" only linked nodes. Therefore we can say
that removing detached object is a bug in all cases.
v1->v2:
- update the commit message. [2] patch;
- fix typos in comments. [2] patch;
- do the "preload" for NUMA awareness. [2] patch;
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) (4):
mm/vmap: remove "node" argument
mm/vmap: preload a CPU with one object for split purpose
mm/vmap: get rid of one single unlink_va() when merge
mm/vmap: move BUG_ON() check to the unlink_va()
mm/vmalloc.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists