linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 24/33] Revert "backlight/fbcon: Add FB_EVENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee90a071-74b4-e9f0-03f9-2e959c333b1f@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 May 2019 12:59:38 +0200
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Yisheng Xie <ysxie@...mail.com>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/33] Revert "backlight/fbcon: Add FB_EVENT_CONBLANK"


On 5/24/19 5:28 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:14 PM Daniel Thompson
> <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:53:45AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 994efacdf9a087b52f71e620b58dfa526b0cf928.
>>>
>>> The justification is that if hw blanking fails (i.e. fbops->fb_blank)
>>> fails, then we still want to shut down the backlight. Which is exactly
>>> _not_ what fb_blank() does and so rather inconsistent if we end up
>>> with different behaviour between fbcon and direct fbdev usage. Given
>>> that the entire notifier maze is getting in the way anyway I figured
>>> it's simplest to revert this not well justified commit.
>>>
>>> v2: Add static inline to the dummy version.
>>>
>>> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
>>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Yisheng Xie <ysxie@...mail.com>
>>> Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> Hi Daniel
>>
>> When this goes round again could you add me to the covering letter?
>>
>> I looked at all three of the patches and no objections on my side but
>> I'm reluctant to send out acks because I'm not sure I understood the
>> wider picture well enough.
> 
> It's one of these patch series with some many different subsystems and
> people you can't cc the cover to all of them or mailing lists start
> rejecting you because too many recipients. I tried to spam sufficient
> mailng lists, but I guess not enough.

BTW Not all relevant patches were posted to linux-fbdev and me (i.e.
"[PATCH 05/33] fbdev/sa1100fb: Remove dead code") - I found them on
other mailing lists but it requires some additional work from me to
find / process them. If possible please Cc: linux-fbdev & me on all
patches in the patchset. Thanks!

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics